"My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness."

Gentiles, tax collectors, and my mom – Part 1

Here’s the passage that’s given me the most trouble in guiding my behavior toward my mom.

“If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother. But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that BY THE MOUTH OF TWO OR THREE WITNESSES EVERY FACT MAY BE CONFIRMED. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.” Matthew 18:15-17

My mom has hardened her heart. For her entire Christian life, minus the last year, she has believed that divorce is wrong. But a year ago, she divorced my dad, because she decided that God would rather have her be happy, and “divorce isn’t really a sin anyway, it’s all about how you interpret the Bible!” Within six months she’d found and married a new, “more godly” man (his fourth marriage, but who’s counting?). In this time, I gently and kindly confronted her with scripture and love, then went to her with her best friend and her sister, then with an elder and his wife from our church. She repeatedly blew all of us off. Finally, she baldly told me she wanted her new man more than she wanted her relationship with me and my family. To this I responded with intense sadness that our relationship would have to change as a result of her choices.

Now, six months after this admission of priorities, she’s trying to woo me. I say “woo” because that’s what it feels like. She’s constantly calling, emailing, instant messaging. Calling me Dear or Sweetie or Honey. Asking how we’re doing, if I want to get together, can she pray for me, how about she come watch the kids so E and I can have a date. Emailing me little Christian anecdotes or devotionals. Treating me the way we’ve always related, up to a year or so ago.

I know she thinks that enough time has passed for me to have “cooled off” and “grown accustomed” to her being remarried. But this is not something time alone will heal. I am faced with having to define our relationship to her, which means I must finally commit myself to some firm guidelines of what it looks like to “let [her] be to [me] as a Gentile or a tax collector.”

Praising my kids

When you compliment my kids, please don’t tell them they’re cute. Don’t go on about how beautiful they are, or talk about Lou’s shiny blonde hair or Bug’s adorable brown curls. Don’t talk about Lou’s smile, or Doozer’s green eyes, or Bug’s sultry eyelashes.

Or if you do, make sure it’s infrequently.

My kids are gorgeous. They just are. No question. But I don’t want them to grow up hearing about it constantly. They absorb and internalize everything we say to them (and much that we say to others). Tell one of them that their somersault was very impressive, and all of a sudden I have three children somersaulting all over the floor, crying out, “Look at me, Mama! Isn’t my somersault great?” You get more of what you acknowledge, and especially more of what you praise.

I don’t want them to think their beauty comes from their outward appearance, but if that’s all they ever hear about it can be easy for them to grow up thinking so.

If you compliment my children (and please do!), try to compliment a virtue they’re currently exhibiting. Tell them they’re sweet, or helpful, or caring, or gentle, or kind, or patient, or joyful. I’ve been very conscious to notice these characteristics in their behavior and to label them in a praise. Consequently, I often hear one of the girls tell me, “Mommy, I’m being so helpful to Doozer!” as she holds his hand to assist him down the stairs. Or one will get a cup for the other who has mentioned her thirst, “I’m such a sweet girl!” When waiting in line, “We gotta be patient now.” I want them to learn that (well, not that their value comes from their behavior, their value comes from their Creator) these virtues are something to strive for, that they are valuable, moreso than beauty or cuteness. When they become teens I don’t want them to spend time brainstorming how to become more physically beautiful, I want them to collaborate on how to be kinder and more loving.

I also want them to know that youth and youthful beauty is to be enjoyed for a time, but kindness is beautiful whether one is five or eighty-five.

Italian meatloaf and Garlic zucchini pasta

dscf89921.jpg

My husband’s love language is “meatloaf.” Somehow Dr. Chapman saw fit to not include this language and recipe in his popular books, so I’ve had to figure it out on my own. I now have several different meatloaf recipes that I cook up on occasion, especially when E has had a tough work week or is otherwise in need of encouragement. Doozer scarfs meatloaf like he hasn’t eaten in weeks, and the girls enjoy it with plenty of “cap-it” (ketchup) or pasta sauce.

Italian meatloaf, serves 6

  • 1 lb ground beef
  • 1 lb Italian sausage
  • 1 c pasta sauce
  • 2 eggs, lightly beaten
  • 1.5 c oatmeal
  • 2 tsp garlic powder
  • 2 tsp Italian seasoning
  • 2 tbsp dried minced onion
  • 3 tsp beef bouillon
  • Shredded mozzarella

Mix all ingredients and shape into a loaf. Bake at 350 for one hour. After removing it from the oven, sprinkle it generously with shredded mozzarella and let melt. Serve slathered with more pasta sauce.

Garlic zucchini pasta, serves 3

  • 3 medium zucchini, chopped
  • olive oil
  • 3 tsp minced garlic (or to taste)
  • 8oz spaghetti, cooked to al dente

Heat 1 to 2 tablespoons of olive oil and the garlic in a skillet over medium heat. Saute the garlic a few minutes. Add zucchini, reduce heat and cover, stirring occasionally until zucchini are tender. Add the drained pasta and salt to taste, stir and toss until the oil is absorbed into the pasta. Serve.

JuneBug the Bug-Slayer!

Armed with a shoe and a roll of toilet paper, no insect is a match for JUNEBUG THE BUG-SLAYER!

shoe.jpg

Beware, dastardly bugs everywhere, for JuneBug the Bug-Slayer is ever-vigilant, ever watchful! She can spot you in the darkest corners, in the highest crevices, and with a loud cry of “It’s a BAD ROACH!” she will run to retrieve her bug-destroying tools! She will speedily swoop to bring you to your demise under the tread of Daddy’s tennis shoe! Then she will unceremoniously squish your carcass into a wad of toilet paper and flush you into the next world! No six-legged creature is safe in her vicinity, so consider carefully when you are tempted to enter the Rock home!!!

Be very, very afraid!

insect.jpg

(Anyone got a good pattern for a superhero costume? I need to sew one for my daughter.)

Preferential adopters

In the world of adoptive parenting, the term “preferential adopters” generally refers to those who adopt before having biological children. Another definition says they are those who adopt for reasons other than infertility. Still another definition says they prefer adoption to birthing as a means of adding children to a family.

None of these definitions satisfies me. E and I would be termed preferential adopters, because we adopted before having biological children and we have no fertility issues. But by no means do we prefer one method over another for having more children. I resent the value judgments implied by those who use the term. “Preference” implies a matter of taste, everone’s entitled to their own, but supercilious attitudes tend to accompany the tastes (as is common in America). Either we prefer adoption because we think the world is overpopulated and it’s selfish to become a parent through birth, or “Oh, you poor thing, you must be infertile,” and I want to scream at the idea that infertility is the only reason I would choose to parent kids whose DNA isn’t half mine.

We adopted because… well, why not? We want lots of children and lots of children need families. We birthed children because… well, why not? We want a lot of children and we’re capable of conceiving and birthing children. Each route has its pros and cons, but in our eyes they’re equally legitimate. We plan to do more of both.

Dance myself to sleep

The girls currently share a full bed, but as soon as we move, they’re each getting their own twin bed. Here’s why:

(JuneBug is Bert and Lou is Ernie)

My little CM experiment

We plan to homeschool our children. Our oldest are only three years old, so I’m trying to get a head-start on planning which general approach we will use. I am gravitating toward the Charlotte Mason method, because it seems to most closely match my own educational philosophy, even though I’ve never sat down and outlined exactly what that would encompass. Perhaps I should.

My favorite in vivo example of a Charlotte Mason education is found at The Common Room. In trying to explain to E what a CM education means and what it would look like, I’ve spent quite a bit of time perusing their archives as well as digesting the wealth of info at Ambleside Online. Unfortunately, our local library carries nothing by Miss Mason and nothing on her methods and philosopies, so I’ll either have to read her books online (which I generally dislike) or go visit Amazon.com. I have a feeling I’ll be wanting to regularly re-read, so I will likely do the latter.

I was eager to accept narration as a superior test and exercise of a student’s retention of a reading, but had little experience to prove it. Until the Harry Potter book came out, anyway. E and I were both chomping at the bit to read it when it arrived, and although I had given him the first read (it was, after all, the week of his birthday), he graciously offered to share it. “I’ll read two chapters, then you can read two chapters, and we’ll just trade off until we’re done,” he suggested.

Begin to read a distractingly-anticipated book, and then voluntarily (albeit temporarily) stop after only two chapters??? Surely he was joking. I was looking forward to reading it in the same manner I’d read book 6: putting the kids to bed, brewing a pot of coffee, and ravenously consuming the entire thing while the household slept. I mean, it was nice of him to want to share, he knew how much I wanted to read it (and boy, did I!), but truthfully, the idea of reading it in small bites sounded like self-inflicted torture. I’d made it this long spoiler-free, I could hold off another 24 hours until he finished.

So I thought. But I surreptitiously began to pick up the book and read whenever he set it down to go to the bathroom or get a drink. The desire to read some of it now was stronger than that to read it all-at-once later. So we agreed. Two chapters for him, two for me. Two for him, two for me. Like children splitting Halloween candy, we dutifully shared the bounty, jealously watching to make sure neither extended his allotted two chapters without handing it over.

And what did I do during E’s reading time? I paced the floor, my mind roving over and over the details of the previous two chapters, trying to fit and re-fit the pieces together like a small child working a 1000-piece puzzle. I spoke aloud, rehashing the plot (E had the first shift, so he’d already read what I was discussing) and postulating my theories. E would pipe up his thoughts or corrections, or maddeningly assure me that my question about that would be answered in the chapter he was then reading. Whereas with a straight-through reading, I would have had my questions answered before I’d even considered asking, the bite-sized segments gave my brain more of a workout. I actually found in the end that I enjoyed the book more this way, and retained far more of it later.

I wonder if part of the magic of Harry Potter, the magic that supposedly inspired many children to read who otherwise would rather play video games and watch movies, is actually the effect of a diluted Charlotte Mason method. The mystery-in-installments format gave readers plenty of time to hash and hypothesize between books, then reformulate after finishing the next book. Kind of sounds like the short readings followed by handwork and time to think over the reading, common within CM.

Let her be

A lot of my regular reads are discussing abortion right now. I know where I stand (abortion is always wrong), but I find it enlightening and somewhat brain-frying to read blogs of pro-abortion folks. I like to understand their perspective and reasonings, though.

Until today I had forgotten one aspect of how deeply abortion could have affected my life, and I never would have known the difference.

My daughters are adopted from foster care. Both entered our home as foster children within a week of their births. When we finally adopted JuneBug, we got a ream of paper detailing every aspect of the case, including her mother’s history. Turns out Bug was her third child and the third removed from her for various reasons. She had aborted several other children. What caused her to not abort Bug? What circumstances were different in her life that led her to make a different choice at that time? Would things have been easier for her if she had chosen abortion? In the short run, yes. She wouldn’t have endured the physical difficulties of pregnancy, the heartache of delivering and having the baby taken away, the depression and sense of failure from trying to work the rehabilitation plan to bring the baby home, spending a heart-rending one hour per week with the baby, weeping but trying to love and enjoy the baby during that brief time, then eventually trying to forget, trying not to remember the sweetness of seven pounds of baby girl in her arms, the baby she couldn’t or wouldn’t get back. With abortion, the potential child is gone, permanently erased from the earth. With pregnancy, delivery and (closed) adoption, the child is sent out into the world and you never know what happens to him or her. The unknown life can be harder on the mother than the known death.

But does that really justify killing a child to ease your mind?

I don’t know any of her personal details, and likely never will, but I am eternally grateful for her choice, her constant choice for nine months, to not abort her baby. Not because I selfishly love that baby, who is now my three year old daughter, although I do. But because I see the beautiful child, the creative, musical, nurturing, sensitive, incredible child before me who otherwise would be long discarded. When I consider her role in our family, in our hearts and on this planet, and then I think about her just flat-out not existing, not being there, never being given the chance to even develop a personality, it’s enough to make me struggle to breathe again. Sure, technically she wouldn’t know the difference. Honestly, we wouldn’t know the difference either, because she never would have entered our lives.

But I am profoundly grateful that she is. And by extension I will evermore be profoundly grateful to her mother for choosing to let her be.

buginbluebonnets.jpg

The naming of cats is a difficult matter…

Me: “Hey girls, what do you think we should name the baby?â”

Bug: “Hmmmm — I think ‘Lou!’”

Me: “Awww, silly, we already have a Lou in our family!”

Bug: “Oh.”

Lou: “I think ‘Doozer!’”

Me: “But we also have a Doozer already!”

They’re catching on that this is funny, and that they’re making a joke.

Bug: “How ’bout ‘JUNEBUG!’”

Me: Sigh.

Can you imagine how the conversation will ensue when we have to name their two new kittens?

Hating your mother

Sometimes I come across a passage in the Bible that just doesn’t make sense to me. I read, re-read, cross-reference, search my books, ask my husband, and particularly when it’s in the gospels, cry out, “How could Jesus have said that? What in the world does he mean?”

For as bright as I like to think I am, I sometimes forget that one does not know everything at the age of 25, even if I do have more kids than most of the moms in my church. I forget that sometimes the Bible is illuminated by experience, and then I get a flash of, “Ohhhhhhh!”

Luke 14: 26 “If anyone comes to Me, and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be My disciple.”

I’m coming upon the one-year anniversary of this verse’s illumination in my life. December 2006, over Christmas dinner at my aunt’s house, my three-months-divorced mother shyly said to me, “I have a friend I’d like you to meet sometime.”

As background, it is necessary to understand that my mother and I have historically enjoyed a super-close friendship. I never experienced the classic parent-hating phase so common to tweens and teens. Mom and I had so many of the same interests, we talked all the time, we agreed on so much, and she taught me to live my beliefs with conviction. (Looking back I realize that this friendship was probably quite unhealthy – the psychological term is “enmeshed” – at times, because now that I am a mother I recognize that there are subjects not suitable for discussion with your child.) We’d have minor disagreements but they were always resolved and forgotten quickly.

Now, my mom knew I did not agree with her divorcing my dad. I do not believe hers are Biblically-supported reasons, and she is a Christian so I do hold her to Biblical standards (especially given the closeness of our relationship). But she did it, telling me she just wanted to be happy by herself, with her dogs, and just settle back and be grandma to my kids, living life single. Now, she’s telling me she has “a friend” that she wants me to meet. (I discovered later that she had put up a profile on an online dating site before the divorce was final.) I briefly and kindly explained that the Bible does not allow for remarriage after divorce in her case. She disagreed and we exchanged several emails on the subject, which became increasingly angry and defensive on her part. In February I met with one of our church’s elders and his wife. They have known my family (and she has been close friends with my mom) for ten years. They were heartbroken to hear of her actions and decisions, and I had them read all my emails and hear my position. I begged them to test me and find where my attitude, position, tone, words, anything was wrong or even not as loving and Christian as it could or should be. Mostly I asked him what my relationship with her should look like if she responded as I prayed and hoped she would not: if she went ahead with what she wanted to do anyway. I asked, “What does it look like to ‘treat them as a Gentile and tax collector,’ as the Matthew 19 passage says? What does that look like when it’s your mom?”

A few weeks later, the poopy hit the fan. Mom called, said she wanted to come over to talk about it. I tried to lovingly explain what the Bible said, but she would hear none of it. “We’re engaged,” she said, “And if you’re going to tell me that I have to choose between you and him, then I choose him.” I told her that I could not support this, and that it would mean that our relationship would change. She became furious, screamed at me in front of the kids and stormed out of the house. She married him a month later.

And now I understand Jesus’ words. He speaks comparatively. He is not nullifying his command to love others, he’s not suggesting that we treat our families as if we hate them. He’s saying that compared to how much we love him, it should appear that we hate all others we love. It’s hyperbole.

I don’t think I would have understood this passage unless I’d been forced to choose between my mother and my Jesus. She is still incredibly hurt by my choice, and believes I’m one of those condescending, judgmental* Christians. She used to be like that, she says, but she knows better now, and she feels sorry for me. God is love, she says, God is not judging and all that.

But I disagree. God is love, yes. But God also requires obedience. God is judging. He is justice. And none of this contradicts. The whole reason Jesus had to die is because of this. Because God loved us, he wanted us to be with him, but because we had sinned and he is perfect and just, we could not be with him. We were eternally marked with our sins, and he could not have us with him. So he provided a way, through Jesus’ death, for us to come back to him without contradicting himself. Jesus’ death paid the debt for our sins and erased those marks, so that we are no longer sinful people coming to be with God, we are perfectly clean and pure people coming to be with God.

Am I grieved at the present state of my relationship with my mom? Oh yes, deeply. Do I hate my mother? No, not at all. I still love her very much. But if you ask her, she’d probably say I hate her. And I believe that’s exactly what Jesus meant.

I wonder how much more of the Bible I will understand if I have the privilege and blessing to live to the age of 80.

*Here’s my favorite explanation of the oh-so-common and incorrect usage of the verse, “Judge not, lest ye be judged.